Every claim shows its work
64,061 relationships between 1,056 plants, 1,557 conditions and 1,173 pharmacological actions — and not one of them is stated without the grade of evidence behind it.
- Clinical trial, whole plant23
- Human data on an extract1,995
- Laboratory or animal only21,153
- Traditional use, no science reviewed40,890
64%
is folklore, and we say so
Nearly two thirds of what is written about herbs is traditional use with no science reviewed. It isn't worthless — but it isn't evidence, and you deserve to know which you're reading.
141
plants you'll never be handed
Herbs rated "do not self-administer" are hidden by default everywhere on this site. You can ask to see them. We won't volunteer them.
121
named references, not vibes
Every relationship traces back to a citation you can look up — Commission E, WHO monographs, published trials. No "studies show".
One map, not ten thousand articles
Search a plant, a symptom or an action and follow the connections outward. The Atlas is the whole corpus in one view — 734 conditions have enough behind them to stand on their own.
Open the Atlas →Reviewed by people, not generated by a machine
The knowledge graph is extracted from published pharmacological reference works and checked against them. Editorial content is reviewed by The Sarv Health Team, and we publish how we work.
Our editorial process →