1,056 plants · 64,061 graded relationships

Make sense of
1,056 medici

Every claim in our knowledge graph carries the grade of evidence behind it — from traditional use through laboratory work to clinical trials. Most herbal writing blurs that line. We draw it.

Explore the Atlas
  • Herb
  • Condition
  • Action
  • line weight = strength of evidence

Why people love Sârv

Every claim shows its work

64,061 relationships between 1,056 plants, 1,557 conditions and 1,173 pharmacological actions — and not one of them is stated without the grade of evidence behind it.

  • Clinical trial, whole plant23
  • Human data on an extract1,995
  • Laboratory or animal only21,153
  • Traditional use, no science reviewed40,890

64%

is folklore, and we say so

Nearly two thirds of what is written about herbs is traditional use with no science reviewed. It isn't worthless — but it isn't evidence, and you deserve to know which you're reading.

141

plants you'll never be handed

Herbs rated "do not self-administer" are hidden by default everywhere on this site. You can ask to see them. We won't volunteer them.

121

named references, not vibes

Every relationship traces back to a citation you can look up — Commission E, WHO monographs, published trials. No "studies show".

One map, not ten thousand articles

Search a plant, a symptom or an action and follow the connections outward. The Atlas is the whole corpus in one view — 734 conditions have enough behind them to stand on their own.

Open the Atlas →

Reviewed by people, not generated by a machine

The knowledge graph is extracted from published pharmacological reference works and checked against them. Editorial content is reviewed by The Sarv Health Team, and we publish how we work.

Our editorial process →

How Sârv works

The Atlas is the evidence. This is what we do with it for you.

  1. 01

    Tell us how your body works

    A few questions about your lifestyle, constitution and health history. Not a quiz for its own sake — it's what makes the rest specific to you rather than generic.

  2. 02

    See what the plants actually do

    Every recommendation comes out of the same evidence graph you can explore here, so you can always follow a suggestion back to the studies and sources behind it.

  3. 03

    Get a routine you can follow

    Preparations, amounts and timings matched to your goals — with the cautions and interactions surfaced, not buried. Practitioner support when you want a person in the loop.

Where the evidence comes from

We don't write herbal claims. We re-model what published pharmacological reference works already record, keep the citation attached, and show you the grade.

64,061

Handbook of Medicinal Herbs, 2nd ed.

James A. Duke et al. · 2002

Every relationship extracted from this work keeps its original citation codes, resolved to 121 named references you can look up.

What we don't do

  • We don't reproduce the source texts — we cite them.
  • We don't present traditional use as though it were clinical evidence.
  • We don't surface the 141 plants rated unsafe for self-administration unless you ask.
  • We don't publish a condition page without at least three plants behind it.

Who checks it

Editorial content is reviewed by The Sarv Health Team. The extraction pipeline is re-runnable and checked against the source works, and we publish how we work.

Our editorial process →

This information is for general wellness and educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Traditional use is not evidence of effectiveness. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before using any herb — especially if you are pregnant, nursing, or taking medication.

We'll send you content you'll not only enjoy reading but also want to apply.

By submitting, I consent to Sârv, and its affiliates contacting me by email at the address provided about its products and services.